As
an exercise to get some experience writing/designing surveys, you analyzed the
Writing Option pre-post survey for Writing Majors. This survey is (in theory)
completed by all students when they BEGIN the writing option major (at the
beginning of 2020=> the first course they should tak), and when they complete
the Writing Option Major (at the end of 4817). Its purpose is to give the
Department an understanding of:
- what students know, feel, and can do with respect to our student learning outcomes when they enter the program
- what students know, feel, and can do with respect to our student learning outcomes when they complete the program
Student Learning Outcome #1: students will produce essays through a series of drafts that include exploratory writing or talk, as well as revisions that include addition, deletion, substitution and rearrangement.
1,5,7, 12,14,15,16
Student Learning Outcome #2: students will identify central
ideas/themes of a text through class discussion and writing.
2,4,6,7,8,11, 17
Student Learning Outcome #3: students will use two or more
methodologies from English Studies to develop original research or creative
products.
2,4,6,7,9,15
Student Learning Outcome #4: students will demonstrate ability to
give a compelling oral presentation.
6,7,8,10,13, 18
Student Learning Outcome #5: students will connect ideas from
classroom assignments to contemporary issues in class discussion and
presentations.
2,3, 8,9, 19
This distribution seems to indicate that the SLOs are generally covered = but you had lots to say about the survey's effectiveness in terms of its repetitiveness, languge choices, and the scale for responding to the quesitons (strongly agree ->strongly disagree). In particular, you noted that
- language in questions 4,6, 12, 13, and 14 is confusing
- questions 15, 11, 4, 13, and 9 cover the 5 learning outcomes - and the rest of the questions feel confusing because they repeat them in ways that make students wonder if they are missing something
- students want to reply from a "coherent" self - soquestions 1,5,12, and 14 are all about revision, and the wording is VERY similar - and this is confusing because some answers might be conflicting
- the "emotional " component of 2, 8, & 10 seems out of place = maybe save the "feeling" questions for 16-19 (have all the emotional questions in one place)
- different answering options would allow for more accurate information (maybe yes, no, I don't know)
- put the survey in plain English
- additional areas that should have questions= questions about using technology and collaborating with other writers
So I am still taking all this in, but it occurs to me that to do a good job revising this survey, we will need a "panel" of students. Anyone interested? We can talk about this in class.
For next class:
Blog 10: Reflect on what our discussion of the Writing Option major survey suggests about: 1) the way language works (think about Gee); 2) what kinds of information you can collect with surveys; and 3) what challenges researchers face when desigining quantitative instruments (things that are reduced to numbers => like surveys, "objective" tests and so on).
Thanks for your great participation today. You provided clear concise feedback that we should be able to use. Good analytic skills!
No comments:
Post a Comment